Mike Klein Online

Would You Invest In Public Education If It Was A Business? Probably Not!

Mike Klein

Kids are getting smarter every day.  We know this is true because test scores are rocketing, graduation rates are soaring, parents are thrilled, teachers have never been happier and the return-on-investment is absolutely off the charts.  Kids have become learning zealots and this is happening because the more money we spend on education, the better our results.  So, let’s just go ahead and declare it:  Education is fixed; time now to move onto something else.

Okay, you can blink now.

Real education today is a very different landscape.  We face extraordinary challenges moving kids through middle school, high school and beyond.  Far too many leave formal education without any diploma or certificate.  Far too many are unprepared for futures.  Far too few parents understand why or how this happened.  Far too many good teachers feel beaten down or at war with their school systems and far too many marginal or poor teachers remain in our classrooms.

Education is not fixed.  Just this week U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said 82% of schools could fail to meet No Child Left Behind goals this year, which may say more about the flawed NCLB model than about schools or kids, but it is worth noting here.  Others also see issues.

American public education is in “a productivity crisis because per pupil spending adjusted for inflation has more than doubled in the last four decades while outcomes for students have been flat,” says education myth buster and researcher Jay Greene.  “Kids are not significantly worse off than they were four decades ago, but they are no better off.”

Jay Greene

Greene analyzes gates that open paths to learning and roadblocks that close them.  His hats include University of Arkansas director of education reform studies, George W. Bush Institute fellow, former Manhattan Institute scholar and author for publications too numerous to mention.  His best known title is “Education Myths: What Special-Interest Groups Want You to Believe About Our Schools and Why It Isn’t So.”  Greene takes on all targets; nobody is safe.

This past weekend Greene addressed a Georgia Public Policy Foundation leadership breakfast.  “In very broad terms, the problem is resources that are devoted to schools are unattached to the outcomes,” Greene said.  “It doesn’t matter whether schools do better or worse for them to get resources.  They are entitled to resources and they receive them by right rather than by effort.”

Last month the University of Southern California published a study that compared 2009 U.S. public education spending and academic performance with eleven other nations.  America spent $809 billion and the other eleven countries combined spent $988 billion.  Yet, American students ranked ninth in science and tenth in mathematics achievement tests.

CATO Institute research published in January said federal, state and local per pupil public education spending adjusted for inflation is nearly 2.5 times greater than in 1970, (see what Greene said above!) but there was no comparable increase in academic performance.  CATO said reading and math scores remained flat over 40 years and science scores declined.

Colin Powell

America’s Promise Alliance was founded by retired four-star General and former Secretary of State Colin Powell and his wife, Alma Powell.  Last November APA reported the U.S. national graduation rate reached 75% in 2008.  APA said this was a 3% gain in seven years.  Still, it means 25-in-100 or 25,000-in-100,000 or 250,000-in-1 million do not graduate.  That is scary.

“Anytime an organization spends more than twice as much to produce no more in outcome you have a problem,” says Greene.  “Any industry that was unable to improve its outputs despite doubling its inputs would be an industry that would be gone.  But education doesn’t go away.  Public schools don’t go away.  They just keep going.”

Greene’s presentation included his thoughts on the “fuzzy labels” sometimes used to evaluate learning, such as in Florida where they tried “excelling, progressing (or) meeting goals. The trouble is that no one was quite sure what the different categories were or what they meant and they all seemed pretty cheerful.  Needs improvement is the bad one and that’s not so bad.”

Florida public schools education underwent radical changes within the past decade, extensively engineered by former Governor Jeb Bush.  Greene said Hispanic students in Florida today perform better than the averages of all students in 30 states, adding, “This is a state that went from being very much below average to above average.”

Greene spoke at length about the social vs. test-based promotions.  He noted several studies in Florida and Wisconsin confirmed that marginal students who are held back one year are able to demonstrate better performance the following year, and much better performance in subsequent years than marginal students who were pushed ahead to the next grade.  “The difference wasn’t huge after one year, but after two years, the difference grew to be fairly large.”

The national trend toward smaller class size means we have 3.2 million public school teachers. To see that through another lens, more than 1% of all Americans are public school teachers.  “It’s really hard to have 3.2 million excellent teachers,” Greene said.  “We’ve increased the number of teachers but we’ve decreased their average quality.”

Greene also noted 13% of all public school students nationwide are diagnosed as disabled, more than double the percentage thirty years ago.  He thinks it is largely a money race, schools chasing dollars that are available to support programs for students who are “disabled.”

“What schools do is they see kids struggling and they figure out, ‘How can we help these kids move along?’  Then they realize the state has made money available to us if only we identify the student as having a processing problem.  If we just say we’ve done a bad job or the kid has difficulty at home, we don’t get any extra resources to help the kid,” Greene said.

“Short-term this is a very well intentioned act on the part of people in schools.  But long-term it is very bad because it alters everyone’s expectations about that child who has now been identified as having a processing problem in the brain.  The child has new expectations about himself.  The parents have new expectations about the child.  All the educators have new expectations and this has a very negative effect on the child long-term.”

(Mike Klein is Editor at the Georgia Public Policy Foundation.)

March 10, 2011 - Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: